Abstract
This article shows how the Enneagram of Consciousness model [1] can be
used to calculate Jungian parameters with data from the Riso-Hudson
Enneagram Type Indicator (RHETI 2.5),and how the calculated Jungian
parameters can be correlated with scores from the MBTI Form G, and the
experimental FD33. This approach is effective in explaining patterns in
surveys of reported Enneagram and MBTI data. It is also well suited for an
in-depth analysis for one person, as is demonstrated by Jim's RHETI 2.5
data. Wyman has reported on MBTI Psychological Type and Enneagram
Personality Type traits for individuals in a clinical setting. She has not
used Enneagram Type Indicators in this work.
Section One: The Reported Test Data and Jungian Definitions
The reported RHETI [2] test data is shown below along with some MBTI [3]
and FD33 [4] data for comparison.
1.1 Scores from RHETI 2.0 and 2.5 were taken over a two year period.
The Riso-Hudson Enneagram Personality Type names are used below.[5]
Notice that the scores for four points (Nine, One, Six, and Seven) are
exactly the same. Jim's RHETI 2.5 scores for Point Eight -The Challenger,
and Point Two - The Helper are higher by three and four points
respectively.
1.2 Scores from MBTI Form G and FD33 for Comparison.
F: Feeling 14 13
T: Thinking 3 6
N: Intuition 15 11
S: Sensing 6 7
E: Extraversion 8
I: Introversion 19
J: Judgment 11
P: Perception 15
1.3 Definitions of Jungian Functions on the Enneagram of Consciousness.
The most differentiated Jungian functions of consciousness for each
enneagram point are defined below. The notation uses F, T, S, N, M
(for feeling, thinking, sensation, intuition, and moving) to indicate the
five functions. The notation uses subscripts e or i for attitude, along
with the "number" of the enneagram point. For example, the notation Fe-2
names the extraverted feeling that is the dominant and superior Jungian
function at Enneagram Point Two. Each of the nine points is defined below.
Se-7 and Si-8 name the Jungian irrational Perception functions for
sensation (S). Sensation is the superior gift. It is the most consciously
used function at Points 7 and 8. Sensation is extraverted or directed
outward towards the object at Point Seven, but introverted or directed
inward towards the subject at Point Eight. Point Eight monitors the
background instinctive energy level while the body moves at Point Three.
Ne-4 and Ni-9 name the Jungian irrational Perception functions for
intuition (N). Intuition is the superior gift. It is the most consciously
used function at Points 4 and 9. Intuition is extraverted or directed
outward towards the object at Point Four, but introverted or directed
inward towards the subject at Point Nine.
Te-1 and Ti-5 name the Jungian rational Judgment functions for thinking
(T).Thinking is the superior gift. It is the most consciously used
function at Points 1 and 5. Thinking is extraverted or directed outward
towards the object at Point One, but introverted or directed inward
towards the subject at Point Five.
Fe-2 and Fi-6 name the Jungian rational Judgment function for feeling or
valuing (F). Feeling is the superior gift. It is the most consciously used
function at Points 2 and 6. Feeling is extraverted or directed outward
towards the object at Point Two, but introverted or directed inward
towards the subject at Point Six.
Me-3 names the extraverted moving function at Point Three. The gift is
moving to do physical work, achieve goals, make the correct image (Jungian
Persona), and speak or hear the correct language of the social group.
Intentions and emotions are physically expressed at Point Three from the
"Heart Center" to the listening or watching public. A person may not want
to show emotions that are not consistent with public expectations. The
Persona can hide true emotions behind a mask, much like a stage actor. The
Persona can show only the emotion that the script calls for when the stage
role for Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, or Romeo is acted, for example.
Point Three has a muscle sense function in the 2-3-4 Feeling Triad that is
completely separate from the visceral sensation function from the 8-9-1
Instinctive Triad. The human limbic system supports emotions and
kinesthetic memory supports learned movements in the 2-3-4 Feeling Triad.
The muscle sense at Point Three is associated with acting in the world and
doing work. Point Three's muscle sensation receptors for monitoring force
in the body are in a completely different category from Point Seven's
passive extraverted sensation function for receiving stimuli with the five
senses (see, hear, taste, touch, and smell) from objects in the world
outside the body. However, if one had only a four function Jungian model
it would be quite natural to assign extraverted sensation for receiving
stimuli at Point Three, as John Fudjack has done in earlier work, out of
necessity. After all, the sense of touch is one of the five senses, and
changes in the experienced sensation of touch are experienced after first
moving to perform the act of touching.
Careful observation is needed to differentiate the sensory information
received from real objects in the world from the subject's muscle sense as
their body moves (with the aid of the five external senses) to achieve a
goal, such as, reaching for a ripe apple to eat. The failure to
differentiate object and subject sensory information is an example of
identification with the object. Identifications are a "root cause" of
enneagram personality types.
The intention to touch is followed the willed act of touching, and this is
followed by the sensation of the touchable attributes of the object of
attention. Jung omitted the psycho-motor functions for his theoretical
convenience, but the fifth moving function is required by all of us for
practical necessities of living. A mind can only imagine that it doesn't
need the moving function until the next meal, when the stomach has its
instinctual say in the matter. [6] [7]
The learned moving function account for our ability to replicate learned
patterns in music, sports, and in written or spoken language. Gurdjieff
referred to the learned moving function as a mimicry function. Learning to
communicate with language is a noble human accomplishment that separates
lower beings from human beings. Language is so fundamental that David
Keirsey uses spoken "concrete words" and "abstract words" as one set of
fundamental observable temperament features that are analogous to Jungian
"sensation" and "intuition" psychological functions of perception.
Section Two: Calculating Two Common Enneagram Triad Parameters from RHETI Data
There are two common triad patterns for enneagram personality types. The
first and most widely known pattern was identified by Oscar Ichazo, who
discovered modern enneagram personality types, as we know them. The
Hornevian Triads are the second widely known set of ennagram triads. The
format for both sets of triads is given in the RHETI Version 2.5 type
indicator booklet. These triads are discussed in Personality Type. [8]
Scores for the original Ichazo Triads are shown below for the 8-9-1,
2-3-4, and 5-6-7 groups of three points (triads).
Point Nine (The Peacemaker) has the highest score (21) in the 8-9-1
Instinctive Triad. The Instinctive Triad score is only one unit (+1) above
the median score of 48. The RHETI is designed so that any enneagram point
can have a continuous score between 0 and 32, with a median score of 16.
The 9w1 (Nine with a One wing) is the most significant pair of enneagram
points in the 8-9-1 Instinctive Triad. The 9w1 pair is defined by Point
Nine's superior Jungian introverted intuition function, with a Wing at
Point One for the auxiliary extraverted thinking function. The 9w1 pair
form the formal definition for True MBTI Type INTJ when a person is in
the Healthy Levels of Development identified by Don Riso. The 9w1 is
called the Dreamer by Riso and Hudson.
The 8-9-1 Instinctive Triad is well named. Point Eight is most in touch
with instinct because its superior introverted sensation function (Si-8)
directly monitors the visceral instinctual energy in the Gut Center.
Eight's monitoring function is analogous to an automobile's temperature or
oil gage that monitors engine states as the vehicle bodily moves at
highway speeds towards a destination, while the driver behind the steering
wheel witnesses the event as it unfolds.
Point Nine is most out of touch with instinct because its superior
introverted intuition (Ni-9) is the Unipolar Opposite of Point Eight.
Points Eight and Nine are in each other's Shadow. Point One's instinct is
under expressed because its extraverted thinking (Te-1) is dominant, with
introverted sensation (Si) in second place.
5-6-7 Triad Discussion
Point Six (The Loyalist)has the highest score (19)in the 5-6-7 Thinking
Triad. The Thinking Triad score is above (+2) the median, and higher (+1)
than the 8-9-1 Instinctive Triad score. However, Point Six is lower (-2)
than Point Nine. Point Nine and Six scores repeated exactly over a two
year period. Notice that the scores for Point Six's wings at Seven (15)
and Five (16) are not above the median, but Point Nine's wing at One (18)
is above the median. The 6w7 pair of conscious Jungian functions
corresponds to the definition for the True MBTI Type ISFP. The 6w5
unipolar combination of introverted feeling at Point Six with an
introverted thinking wing at Point Five does not have an MBTI definition
because both functions have the same attitude. The 6w5 is called the
Defender by Riso and Hudson.
Points Six and Nine form a major arrow (9-6, or 6-9) in the enneagram.
This arrow is associated with private introverted feeling and intuition on
the Enneagram of Consciousness.
The 5-6-7 Thinking Triad is well named. Point Five over expresses private
thinking because that is the gift of its superior introverted thinking
function (Ti-8). Point Seven under expresses rational thinking because its
extraverted sensation (Se-7) is the function for irrational perception,
not rational thinking. The 5-7 pair are major functions for the STP
Keirsey Temperament. Point Six is most out of touch with logical rational
objective thinking because it is the introverted function for rational
valuation or feeling, not objective logic.
The 2-3-4 Feeling Triad has the lowest triad score (-2), even though Point
Three has the same score as Point Six.
MBTI Discussion:
Let's briefly consider some of the MBTI Type implications. True MBTI Types
are defined by their position on the Enneagram of Consciousness. The
theoretical function order for Type ISFP in the Thinking Triad is
IF-ES-IN-ET, and for INTJ in the Instinctive Triad the order is
IN-ET-IF-ES. Jim's measured RHETI scores consistently show IN-IF to be his
1st and 2nd functions. RHETI indicates with continuous scores that Jim has
a IN-IF-ET-ES non-traditional function order. This function order is
non-standard for MBTI theory because the attitudes of the first and second
function are the same, not different as specified by MBTI theory. [9]
[10].
Many Jungian analysts consider that the theoretical attitude for a pair of
Jungian functions should be the same, not different. [11], [12] [13] [14]
It turns out that many enneagram arrows such as 6-9, 7-1, 1-4, and 8-5 do
have the same attitude that Jungian psychology predicts. The complete set
of pairs, called Pseudo Types, are discussed in Enneagram of Consciousness
Part 2 article in Enneagram Monthly. [15]
Notice that defining True MBTI Type in terms of a pair of enneagram points
is the easy part. The harder task is to measure each of the eight Jungian
function-attitudes to discern the presence of particular types. Notice
that Jim slightly preferred "P" over "J" with 15 questions out of 26 on
MBTI Form G. Jim "breathes in" with the "P" orientation on the bottom side
of the Enneagram of Consciousness and "breathes out" with "J" on the top
side. Notice that Jim integrates the "P" and "J" sides of the enneagram
with the intentionality function at Point Three (moving function and
Persona).
We can say that Jim can choose the ISFP "role", or he can choose the INTJ
"role". We would further say that Jim, the person, is not a Type, but can
choose a role for the occasion. Choice is emphasized by the Enneagram of
Consciousness. The five functions of consciousness are selected by
free-will when a person is conscious of their choices, and is not
following blind mechanical habits like a automatic machine.
The RHETI instrument is very useful because it measures nine points,
including the image (Persona) and achievement at Point Three. Enneagram
Point Three is called The Achiever (formerly The Motivator) by
Riso-Hudson.
We are very fortunate that Don Riso was successful in correlating Jungian,
Hornevian, and Freudian theory, attributes, and traits to the Enneagram of
Personality Types. We are very fortunate that the pioneering MBTI Form G
indicates a person's True MBTI Type. Care must be taken to ensure that the
person does not report their third and fourth function as their preferred
first and second function during Jungian individuation and type
development. The MBTI and RHETI instruments were invaluable in verifying
the internal consistency of definitions on the Enneagram of Consciousness.
2.2 RHETI Scores for the Assertive, Compliant, and Withdrawn Triads
The Hornevian Triads are widely known. They have been described in detail
by Don Riso in Personality Types, and they are also included as a
necessary analysis pattern in the RHETI 2.5 booklet.
The scores for the Compliant Triad (1-2-6) and Withdrawn Triad (4-5-9) are
exactly the same. Both of these triads are two points above the median
(+2).
Karen Horney [16] reminds us to think holistically. She says:
"In a healthy human relationship the moves toward, against, or away from
others are not mutually exclusive. The ability to want and to give
affection, or to give in; the ability to fight, and the ability to keep to
oneself - these are complementary capacities necessary for good human
relations".
We can say that Jim's Hornevian Triad Priority Order is
Withdrawn-Compliant-Aggressive, or Compliant-Withdrawn-Aggressive. Notice
that the Withdrawn Triad has two intuition functions (total score of 32),
but the Compliant Triad has two feeling functions (total score of 31).
This is consistent with dominant Jungian intuition supported by auxiliary
Jungian feeling, and the NF Temperament.
Jungian Commentary on the Hornevian Triads
The 3-7-8 Triad is well named the Assertive, Moving Against, or Aggressive
Triad. Each function in the triad supports that role. First, the moving
function at Point Three is the actual agent or instrument that moves
against someone or something with force. It is significant that Karen
Horney uses the adjective "moving" with each of her three attitudes; it
confirms the logic of the fifth "moving" function on the Enneagram of
Consciousness. All three points are very grounded because they draw energy
for sensory stimuli such as muscle at Three, the five senses at Six, and
the viscera at Eight.
The 1-2-6 Triad is well named the Compliant, or Moving Towards Triad
because it contains the introverted and extraverted feeling functions for
valuing and complying with standards of value. The extraverted thinking
function at Point One is oriented towards rules, order, and standards of
compliance.
The 4-5-9 Withdrawn Triad is well named the Withdrawn Triad because it is
the most introverted of the three Hornevian Triads. Point Five has the
superior introverted thinking function and Point Nine has the superior
introverted intuition function. Even though Point Four's gift is
extraverted intuition, its bipolar opposite unconsciously controlled
introverted sensation function provides the experience of private heart
felt sensations.
Section 3: Calculations of Jungian and MBTI Parameters from RHETI Data
3.1 Calculating Jungian Psychological S, T, N, F Functions [17], [18]
Notice that we see a different Function Priority Order for Extraverted
and Introverted functions. RHETI shows the priority order to be Ni, Fi,
Ti, and Si with scores of 21, 19, 16, and 10 for introversion. But RHETI
shows the priority order to be Te, Se, Ne, Fe with scores of 18, 15, 13,
and 13 for extraversion.
3.2 Calculating Jungian Psychological E/I Attitudes with RHETI
3.3 Calculating Selected Jungian Triads with RHETI Scores:
The 6-8-4, 2-9-7, and 3-5-1 Triads are members of 12 triads specified on
the Enneagram of Consciousness with the Fractal Geometry Law of 37 for
whole events. [19]
The EMTP pattern is highest (+5). The MBTI cannot distinguish between M
(moving) and N (intuition) because it is not designed for a five function
model - so this EMTP triad would likely be reported as ENTP. EMTP would
likely be included as an ENTP in David Keirsey's Temperament system. [20]
The 1-3-5 triad is correlated with ideas that can be translated into
actions via the psychomotor or the moving function. William James called
this ideo-motor action. [21] Language is a form of "idea in motion". Words, or Logos at Point One are sounded silently in mind, just moments before they are transformed
into spoken words by the learned moving function and heard by other
people.
The EMTP pattern is quite significant. My five function theory is rather
new to most people. But lest we think that it can be easily swept under
the rug and forgotten, remember this. Jung spoke of action in the world,
and psychomotor functions that were needed to "jump across the stream".
However, he focused his attention on a pure psychological model that
agreed with his clinical practice and observations. If you consider the
simple act of seeing your own handwriting on a check or grocery list, then
it obvious that the moving function must come first to cause your
signature or grocery list to be made on paper, so it can be read. There
are psychological and physical consequences to not using the moving
function to write checks and grocery lists. Enneagram Point Nine (superior
introverted intuition with an inferior extraverted sensation function)
follows the 9-3 enneagram arrow to move into action at Point Three.
The 2-9-7 and 6-4-8 Bipolar Jungian Perception Triads:
Notice that the F-N-S order is associated with both the INFP (-6 score)
and the ENFJ (+1 score). Notice also that the M-T-T order for EMTP (+5
score) is higher than either NF Temperament Types. The INFP and ENFJ
patterns can be interpreted as natural choices for processing information
from events in the world as they occur. One cycle begins at Point Three,
where information is received on the bottom side of the Enneagram of
Consciousness" and moves around to the last point on the "P" path at Point
Seven. One cycle continues from Point Eight and moves around the top "J"
side of the enneagram and stops at Point Three to complete the output
cycle.
Information is received by Point Four's superior extraverted intuition
function before it moves on to Point Six's introverted feeling function.
In this respect, the Enneagram of Consciousness provides a visual means
for demonstrating Isabel Briggs Myers' insight of the "Z" diagram for an
information process. [22]
The "J" and "P" Attitudes:
The significance of "J" and "P" becomes apparent on the Enneagram of
Consciousness. The "J" attitude corresponds to the preference to achieve
at Point Three - by getting on with the work, and not wasting any time.
One cycle around the enneagram circle is the minimum amount of time needed
by a"J" type. They must have input to act on. Note that the ISTJ and ESTJ
are defined at the top of the Enneagram of Consciousness in the 8-9-1
Triad. ISTJ corresponds to 8-1 and ESTJ corresponds to 1-8. The Jungian
type at Eight is formed by 8-4 and at Four by 4-8. Remember, Jungian
Psychological Types are defined by their superior-inferior function
bipolar dyad.
David Keiresy observes that the MBTI definitions for the "J" attitude are
very correlated to order, closure, and schedule issues. [23] Closure and
minimizing the number of enneagram information cycles is a very "J"
attitude, especially for decision makers who wish to use the bare minimum
of one cycle around the Enneagram of Consciousness.
David Keirsey observes that the MBTI definitions for the "P" attitude are
very correlated to remaining open. The "P" attitude also corresponds to
achieving at Point Three -while taking more time in their own "judgment" .
"P" wishes to remain open for several cycles of information and data
acquisition. Keeping things open is what "Ps" do on the Enneagram of
Consciousness. One cycle around the enneagram circle is not enough time
for a "P" type, as a "P"Inventor might tell his "J" boss. They do want
order and closure eventually, but after more cycles around the circle
than "J" needs.
The enneagram Law of Seven (1-4-2-8-5-7) names how information must be
stitched together in a linear time sequence to make a whole gestalt. It is
a quite amazing that the 7-1-4-2 sequence in the Law of Seven contains
Jung's entire set of extraverted functions. The coherence of information
from changing events follows this universal law. The Enneagram of
Consciousness is unique because it is a map that names the most
significant conscious information at each enneagram point. The meaning of
each point is not arbitrary.
Jim invests energy in developing his game of tennis. Point Three is where
the tennis racket meets the tennis ball. Most tennis pros describe their
experience of going or moving with the flow when their game is "on".
It is impossible to play a tennis game without learned moving functions
that develop skill to the point where the game is played without effort. A
pro will say that it is impossible to play a good game of tennis if you do
not have confidence in your ability, and if you let doubtful mind
interfere with the body's wisdom as it operates from its natural center of
being. This centered position is at Point Zero on the Enneagram of
Consciousness. We are naturally present to our work at hand with full
attention if we come from our center of stillness - known as the Self.
[24], [25]
3.4 Calculating Bipolar Opposite Jungian Scores using RHETI
It turns out that the most significant bipolar or complementary opposite
Rational pair is the bipolar 1-6 pair of Points. The Te-1 and Fi-6
combination have a score of five points above the median (+5). The most
significant irrational pair is the bipolar pair of Points Nine and Seven
that has a combined score four points above the median (+4). The 9-7
bipolar pair and the 6-1 bipolar pairs form Jungian dyads of psychological
type as well as MBTI types. Thus, we can conceive of these bipolar pairs
as two Jungian types: introverted intuition (9-7), and introverted feeling
(6-1). We can conceive of the two pairs as the patterns 9-1-6-7 (True Type
INTJ), or 9-6-1-7 (Pseudo Type INFI).
The Enneagram of Consciousness takes the position that it is Jungian
psychological type that is most naturally related to enneagram personality
type, and not MBTI type. This means that each point on the enneagram has a
tug of war going on between its bipolar opposite at another point on the
enneagram (the 9-7 and 1-6 pairs, for example). You might say that the
superior function has the inferior function as a dancing partner at each
enneagram point. That simple yang-yin tension causes type behavior when
the superior function is habitually overused, and the inferior function
objects to being "stepped on" or pushed down by the superior function.
Notice that Von Franz's description of an Jungian Psychological Type is
similar to Enneagram Personality Type behavior due to the inferior
function.
It is natural for a person's reported MBTI Type scores to change over time
due to development of less consciously exercised functions. A person's
True MBTI Type is indicated by their first superior and second helping
consciously used functions. It is necessary to use inclusive language to
account for all possible combinations of Jungian functions, so that
non-standard pairs of points called Pseudo types are not forgotten in
discussions of type dynamics. These Pseudo types are fundamental to the
process of moving around the enneagram circle and capturing a whole set of
information on the object of attention in the world. This is analogous to
taking a picture with a camera and not leaving any people out.
3.5 Calculating Unipolar Opposite Jungian Scores
The unipolar Jungian pairs shows Jim's preference for unipolar judgment
(+2) over unipolar perception (-7). The unipolar introverted rational pair
6w5 is favored over extraverted rational pair 1w2 by four points. Jim's
slight preference for introversion also shows up as a very slight
preference for introverted pair 9w8 over extraverted preference 7-4.
Overall the unipolar introverted perception and judgment functions have
the highest scores. Unipolar patterns were found to be very significant in
Enneagram/MBTI Survey Data reported in Issue 1 of the MBTI [26] The 6w5 is
allowed by enneagram theory, but it is not included as a type pair by MBTI
theory.
From meditation practice we find that information about a whole object can
be held in mind with undivided attention. But our minds can only be
focused on one thing in one place at a time. In other words, unipolar
function pairs are necessary to prevent information distortion. This
finding agrees with the theory of Jungian analysts.
At the same time the inferior function of a bipolar opposite pair tends to
present information to conscious mind automatically. It does take effort
and time to look for the opposite unipolar component that cannot be
observed simultaneously with the superior function. We have to look again
in a later moment. When attention is placed on the working surfaces where
objects move, and if the subject is centered as a Witness to the work,
then information is not distorted, and the work proceeds as it should.
We have to be very careful with our language. When we speak of type as a
structure, then we completely agree with Isabel Briggs Myers that
extraverted functions need to be balanced by introverted functions (and
vice-versa). This leads to bipolar pairs that define MBTI Types. The
processes of consciousness that human beings need to hold information in
mind - as it occurs dynamically - is one thing, but typological structures
of mind is another. Information is dynamic and changes from moment to
moment. Personality Type is relatively fixed from moment to moment, and
the differentiation of functions to make full consciousness possible -
takes a lifetime. Edward Whitmont noted that introverted and extraverted
thinking "cannot be engaged in simultaneously but the same person can be
perfectly at home in both. The introverted thinking type usually can use
both with ease." [27]
Section 4: 4. Calculating Scores for Truth (7-1-4), Goodness (2-5-8), and Beauty (3-6-9) Philosophical (Aristotle) Triads [28]
Points 4-6 represents Ne-Fi or ENFP, points 6-4 represents Fi-Ne or INFP,
points 9-2 represents Ni-Fe or INFJ, and points 2-9 represents Fe-Ni or
ENFJ. Pairs of NF enneagram points such Fi-Ni, Ni-Fi, Me-Fi, Fi-Me, Ni-Me,
Me-Ni, Me-Fe, and Fe-Me are named and understood on the Enneagram of
Consciousness. They are not known in MBTI theory because the fifth
function is not recognized, and the same attitude is not recognized for
pairs of functions.
Jim's shows that he has an Enneagram Point Nine (Ni) position with a Wing
at Point One (Te)and two equally strong arrows to Six (Fi) and to Three
(Me). The scores for Point Nine's arrows to Points Three and Six are one
unit higher than Nine's wing at Point One.
We see that Jim is quite flexible on both the "J" and "P" sides of the
Enneagram of Consciousness. When we think in terms of the MBTI "Z" diagram
process on a circle it is clear the NF Temperament can be expressed
several ways, such as ENFP, INFP, ENFJ and INFJ. And we also see unipolar
pairs 6-9, 9-6, 2-4, 4-2 with the same attitude that I refer to as Pseudo
Types. I name 6-9 the Pseudo Type IFNI, 9-6 the Pseudo Type INFI, 2-4 the
Pseudo Type EFNE, and 4-2 the Pseudo Type ENFE.
The notation names the functions in their priority order, such as F-N for
6-9 and 2-4. The notation "I" at the beginning and end (IFNI), and "E" at
the beginning and end (EFNE) shows that both functions are either
introverted or extraverted. The "J" or "P" notation becomes unnecessary,
and as John Fudjack points out that can lead to misleading conclusions
that eliminates Pseudo Types. Although John and I have approached our
subject from different directions, we arrive at similar conclusions,
although he does use the name "Pseudo Type" to identify these function
pairs with the same attitude. These Pseudo Type function pairs are a
necessary part of human work to construct a holistic image of the world as
a whole.
A summary of some of patterns that we have considered on the Geldart
Enneagram of Consciousness is given below.
This article reinforced the findings that unipolar Jungian functions are
fundamental ideas to explain MBTI/Enneagram Survey Data. The same unipolar
direction of attention must be used for the moment-to-moment process of
seeing real living beings and other objects in the world as whole
entities. To do otherwise is to distort the available information at its
source, and is an example of identifications that the enneagram shows how
to identify, and ultimately avoid. It is a paradox that enneagram type
theory and practice can actually be used to overcome the process of
identification known as enneagram type behavior.
Finally, this article shows that there is much common ground between the
enneagram, the MBTI, and the Keirsey Temperament systems, and that we can
learn from each other. We have just begun this fruitful dialog at the EMTI
Journal.
Footnotes
REFERENCES
[1] Walter J. Geldart, The Enneagram of Consciousness and Jungian
Psychology, Full Circle, The Enneagram Institute, Fall 1997, page 4-5, and
12-13.
[2] The Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator, Version 2.5, The Enneagram
Institute, 1998, 18 pages.
[3] Isabel Briggs Myers and Mary McCaulley, Manual: A Guide to the
Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting
Psychologists Press, 1990, 309 pages.
[4] John Fudjack, A Preliminary Report on the FD33 Survey, The Enneagram
and the MBTI (R). Issue #2, Oct. 1998.
[5] Don Richard Riso with Russ Hudson, Personality Types - Using the
Enneagram for Self-Discovery, Houghton Mifflin, 1996.
[6] C. G. Jung, Collected Works, Volume 6, Psychological Types, paragraphs
929-933 Bollingen, 1990, page 530.
[7] Walter J. Geldart, Message 76, MBTI Message Board at Delphi....[Can
you put in a clickable line, or steer people to the place to enter their
EMTI registration?]
[8] Riso and Hudson, Personality Types, pp. 27-55, 432-443.
[9] Isabel Briggs Myers, with Peter B. Myers, Gifts Differing, Chapter 1,
Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983, pp. 1-16.
[10] The Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs
Type Indicator, 1990, page 19.
[11] C. A. Meier, Personality, The Individuation Process in the Light of
C. G. Jung's Typology, Daimon, 1997, page 32 (for example)
[12] Edward C. Whitmond, The Symbolic Quest, Basic Concepts of Analytical
Psychology, Princeton Uniersity Press, 1978, paragraph 4, page 144 (for
example)
[13] Jung, Psychological Types, paragraphs 666-667, page 405 (Jung
implies the first and second function have the same attitude).
[14] Walter J. Geldart, Message 64, EMBTI Message Board at Delphi.
[15] Walter J. Geldart, The Enneagram of Consciousness, Part 2, Enneagram
Monthly, June 1998, pages 8-9.
[16] Karen Horney, "Neurosis and Human Growth", Norton, 1991, page 17.
[17] Marie-Louise Von Franz, Psychotherapy, Shambala, 1993.
[18] Daryl Sharp, Personality Types - Jung's Model of Typology, Inner City
Books, 1987.
[19] Walter J. Geldart, Enneagram Triads on the Enneagram of
Consciousness, Full Circle, The Enneagram Institute, Spring 1998, page
4-5, 12-13. [not clickable from papers yet]
[20] David Keirsey, Please Understand Me 2 - Temperament, Character,
Intelligence, Prometheus Nemesis Books, 1998.
[21] Roberto Assagioli, The Act of Will, Arkana Books, 1992, page 51.
[22] Otto Kroeger with Janet M. Thuesen, Type Talk at Work, How the 16
Personality Types Determine Your Success on The Job, Delacorte Press,
1992, page 163.
[23] David Keirsey, op.cit., pages 12-13.
[24]Von Franz, op.cit, pages 1-2, and elsewhere.
[25] Daryl Sharp, Who Am I Really - Personality, Soul, and Individuation,
Inner City Books, 1995.
[26] John Fudjack and Patricia Dinkelaker, A Third Principle Governing The
Distribution of MBTI Types Across the Enneagram, EMBTI Issue #1, August
1998.
[27] Whitemont, op. cit., page 141.
[28] Walter Geldart, The Enneagram of Equilateral Triangles, Full Circle,
The Enneagram Institute, Summer 1998, page 4-5,9. [and not clickable from
papers yet]
|