The Process Enneagram of Consciousness and RHETI Data

© By Walter J. Geldart, M.Eng., M. Div. - Nov, 1998


Introduction
skip to
section one

This article shows how to use a person's RHETI scores with the Enneagram of Consciousness 1 Process Model to: 1) confirm enneagram personality type, 2) explore preference scores for several Jungian/enneagram information triads associated with specific traits, 3) calculate the preference scores for eight Jungian psychological processes and a ninth moving function, and 4) compare these preference scores with MBTI Form M scores for eight MBTI Scale Preferences (E-I, S-N, T-F, and J-P). The RHETI and MBTI data used in the article was reported by a professional artist.

Section One: The Reported RHETI and MBTI Form M Data 2 3
skip to
section two

1.1 Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicators Scores and Personality Type Names 4

Type      Riso-Hudson         Associated     RHETI               Score  
          Name                Jungian        Total               Above
                              Function       Score               Median

One       The Reformer         Te             19                   +3 
Two       The Helper           Fe             15                   -1 
Three     The Achiever         Me             16                    0 
Four      The Individualist    Ne             26                  +10 
Five      The Investigator     Ti             17                   +1
Six       The Loyalist         Fi             15                   -1 
Seven     The Enthusiast       Se             14                   -2 
Eight     The Challenger       Si              9                   -7 
Nine      The Peacemaker       Ni             13                   -3

The RHETI enneagram scores are close to the median for six Enneagram Points. The highest score is for Enneagram Point Four (+10) that is well known in enneagram personality type theory for their artistic nature. Mark is an artist whose media is the photographic image. RHETI and MBTI show that intuition is his preferred Jungian function. Points Four and Nine have intuition as the conscious Jungian function gift, and their combined intuition score is above the median (+7).

Conversely, Points Seven and Eight have sensation as the conscious Jungian function gift, and their combined sensation function score is below the median (-9). RHETI 2.0 data mapped on the Enneagram of Consciousness and MBTI Form M are in complete agreement that Intuition is preferred over sensation. RHETI was designed to report nine separate scores for nine separate functions for each person. MBTI was designed to report four separate functions for each person.

1.2 The Reported MBTI Form M Scores

Preference                   Preference           Preference  
Dyads & Scores               Clarity              Comment

E vs I   E = 0    I = 21     "I" is Very Clear    Reserved vs Expressive
S vs N   S = 5    N = 21     "N" is Clear         Possibilities vs Facts
T vs F   T = 7    F = 17     "F" is Moderate      Values vs Objective Logic
J vs P   J = 16   P =  6     "J" is Moderate      Product vs Process in Public

Mark's reported MBTI Type is INFJ.

Section Two: Calculating Enneagram of Consciousness Triad Scores
skip to
section three

There are two common sets of three enneagram personality types. The most widely known set was identified by Oscar Ichazo who discovered modern enneagram personality types, as we know them. The Hornevian Triads are a second widely known set of enneagram triads that were discovered by Don Riso. These two sets of triads are discussed in Personality Type 5 and used in the RHETI Type Indicator booklet to determine Enneagram Personality Type.

2.1 Calculating the Ichazo Triad Traits With RHETI Scores

Ichazo Triad Scores
RHETI Instinctive Feeling Thinking
Type Above 16 8-9-1 2-3-4 5-6-7
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Triad Score -7 +9 -2
Triad Rank third first second
Function Order Te-Ni-Si Ne-Me-Fe Ti-Fi-Se

The first place or dominant 2-3-4 Feeling triad has intuition, supported by moving and feeling functions. All three extraverted functions form an extraverted NF Temperament pattern. Intuition and feeling functions were the first and second preferences on the MBTI Form M. This shows excellent agreement between RHETI and MBTI when exemplars are tested. Notice that MBTI specifies that feeling is the second function that supports the first choice intuition function.

Enneagram Commentary

Notice that the 2-3-4 Feeling Triad RHETI score captures Mark's "feeling" function that is also reported as a feeling or valuing preference on MBTI Form M. This "feeling' function correlation is predicted from Jungian principles on the Enneagram of Consciousness, and confirmed by both RHETI and MBTI. Notice also the dynamic character of the Ne-Si dyad on the extraverted direction of attention. It is the Si function that automatically provides"heart" or affective "feeling" in response to extraverted intuition's meaningful perception of the object in the world.

An artist of photographic images uses extraverted intuition to look though the camera lens at people who are sitting for their photo portrait. The artist perceive an image that captures a person's spirit, not just the bare facts on the surface seen with Point Seven's extraverted sensation. The artist arranges and composes the photographic setting so that the image on film matches the desired image in the artist's mind. Intuition and empathy go hand in hand for the artist. Empathy arises automatically as heart-felt caring in that special moment when the artist's intuition recognizes the desired image or Persona, and captures it photographically. The artist's two intuition functions (Ni-9 and Ne-4) work together. The artist actually performs an intentional synthesis between the internal image (Ni) and the external image (Ne) in their own mind as the composition is perfected, but before the image and mood is captured on film.

MBTI Commentary

MBTI measures four Jungian functions (T-F and S-N) without extraverted or introverted attitudes. It makes reasonable and prudent assumptions about eight Jungian functions with either attitude based on reported scores. Mark reports that his preferred attitude is introversion (I), and his preferred Jungian function is intuition (N). He reports a preference for closure (J) in his orientation to the extraverted outer world. The prudent MBTI hypothesis of E-I balance assumes that Mark's dominant intuition is introverted (Ni). Introverted intuition is the gift of Enneagram Point Nine on the Enneagram of Consciousness. Mark's second function preference is for Feeling, and the prudent MBTI hypothesis of J-P balance assumes that his feeling function is extraverted to match the "J" preference. Extraverted feeling is the gift of Enneagram Point Two on the Enneagram of Consciousness. Mark's reported MBTI preferences scores indicate his MBTI type to be INFJ, or a dominant Ni function that is supported by an auxiliary Fe function.

Notice that Mark's reported introverted feeling (Fi-6) preference and extraverted feeling (Fe-2) preference score are exactly the same and only one unit below the median of 16. This shows that Mark's reported NF and N preference is supported by an auxiliary feeling function, but that both attitudes of the feeling function are present in equal amounts. MBTI has no way of knowing that both feeling functions are used equally because it measures only four functions. RHETI measures all eight Jungian functions directly for a person so it can check the MBTI type hypothesis for an individual. The MBTI specification for E-I balance with auxiliary feeling (Fe-2) to support dominant intuition (Ni-9) is both logical and prudent. Mark has followed the MBTI specification to develop extraverted feeling in his own life experience. He has done even more by developing both attitudes of the auxiliary feeling function.

Does Mark uses both attitudes for his dominant intuition function? RHETI can answer this question because two intuition functions are separately measured at Points Nine and Four. It is a surprise that Mark's highest RHETI score is for extraverted intuition type at Point Four, instead of introverted intuition at Point Nine - as predicted by MBTI. Mark's reported MBTI preference was for I with N or Ni, so MBTI theory assumed that E with N or Ne was less significant. How does this contradiction result? MBTI theory affirms and emphasizes necessary and prudent balance for the dominant function by an auxiliary function, and further balance with an auxiliary function whose attitude is opposite to the dominant function attitude.

The Enneagram of Consciousness affirms and emphasizes that it is both necessary and normal to develop both attitudes for the auxiliary and the dominant functions. It is normal and desirable for function pairs to have the same attitude. This is a necessary state for whole consciousness of whole objects of attention. The Enneagram of Consciousness and RHETI data confirm that Jungian functions actually gang up as function pairs with the same attitude such as Fi-Ni at Points 6-9, and Fe-Ne at Points 2-4. The MBTI hypothesis steers a steady course using the criteria of J-P balance, but MBTI has no way of knowing that Mark uses extraverted intuition more than introverted intuition because only four Jungian function preferences can be reported by MBTI. The hypothesis for Je preference and the hypothesis of different attitudes between auxiliary and dominant functions rules out extraverted intuition for Mark.

Mark's superior intuition is a quiet withdrawn function that appears in the 4-5-9 triad as both an extraverted and introverted function. Enneagram dynamics says that it is a fact of life for two introverted NF functions to be attracted on the 9-6 arrow, and two extraverted NF functions to be attracted on the 4-2 arrow. Even though MBTI is restricted to indicating four functions it is still a consistent reliable indicator of what it measures. The 16 MBTI type descriptions are supported by research that confirms the eight MBTI preferences ( E-I, S-N, T-F, J-P).

The Enneagram of Consciousness affirms and emphasizes balance. The bottom "P" side should be chosen for balance, even if the top "J" side of the Jungian Circle of Consciousness is preferred by a person. A person should be able to choose either side, if either side is needed by the work. An artist needs to use their extraverted intuition Ne function reliably in the world, even if they prefer their introverted intuition Ni function. Notice that MBTI prescribes an auxiliary extraverted feeling function Fe to provide balance for Ni, but Enneagram theory prescribes an extraverted thinking function Te to provide balance for Ne with the 4-1 enneagram arrow. The end result is that Mark uses his dominant intuition function or gift with both attitudes, uses his auxiliary feeling function with both attitudes and uses his auxiliary thinking function with both attitudes. They all support his artist Enneagram Type Four artistic gift of intuitively seeing beauty in the world (extraverted intuition), and intuitively seeing beauty in an inner image (introverted intuition). Finally, extraverted sensation Se is only slightly below the median score , and works to support reliable intuition. The Enneagram of Consciousness gives a complete Jungian profile for Mark because RHETI data measures all eight Jungian functions and the Persona/moving function.

2.2 Calculating the Hornevian Triad Traits With RHETI Scores

Hornevian Triad Scores
RHETI Compliant Assertive Withdrawn
Type Above 16 1-2-6 3-7-8 4-5-9
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Triad Score +1 -9 +8
Triad Rank second third first
Function Order Te-Fe-Fi Me-Se-Si Ne-Ti-Ni

The dominant 4-5-9 Withdrawn (Contemplative) triad has two intuition functions and one thinking function. There is a 17 unit difference between the dominant Withdrawn-Intuitive triad that contains two Jungian intuition functions, and the third Assertive-Sensation triad that contains two Jungian sensation functions. The auxiliary Compliant- Feeling triad is just one unit above the median. The Compliant triad is compliant to Collective Norms for Values with two feeling functions and to collective norms for Principles with one thinking function.

Notice that the dominant function order is Ne-Ti-Ni in the dominant Withdrawn Triad, and the second function order is Te-Fe-Fi from the Compliant Triad. Triad 4-5-9 is pure intuition except for one introverted thinking function (Ti), and Triad 1-2-6 is pure feeling except for one extraverted thinking function (Te). RHETI confirms that N and F are the first and second Jungian functions because a thinking function (close to the median) is common to both of these triads. The N-F function priority order predicted by RHETI is confirmed by MBTI since INFJ is the dominant introverted iNtuition function with the auxiliary Feeling function.

MBTI recommends (via the J preference) that Mark's feeling function be extraverted for balance. Many MBTI professionals have interpreted Isabel Myers Briggs type theory much too narrowly in the past. Isabel did not say that the auxiliary feeling function for INFJ can not be introverted, only that both attitudes of the auxiliary need to be developed.6 7 Recent theory and empirical research findings published at the Enneagram and the MBTI show that unipolar N-F function pairs are common with the same attitude. It has taken a long time for this to be appreciated and vocalized in the type community. The progress published at the EMBTI is due to taking a fresh look at Survey data, bringing Jungian ideas for eight functions in step with enneagram ideas, and showing the results on an enneagram circle in a way that the holistic intentions of Isabel Myers Briggs are finally recognized as being obvious!

It is difficult to visualize the dynamics of type in a 4x4 square matrix. It is easier to visualize dynamics when the eight Jungian functions plus the ninth moving function and Persona are correctly located on the circumference of a circle. Then Jungian function pairs with the same attitude can be interpreted as enneagram arrows. Then Jungian synchronicity and a holistic emergence of consciousness can be visualized as an example of fractal patterns.

2.3 Calculating the Philosophical Triad Traits With RHETI Scores

Philosophical Triad Traits
RHETI Truth Goodness Beauty
Type Above 16 1-4-7 2-5-8 3-6-9
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Triad Score +11 -7 -4
Triad Rank first third second
Function Order Ne-Te-Se Fe-Ti-Si Me-Fi-Ni

The three equilateral triangle enneagram can be defined on the Enneagram of Consciousness by Aristotle's philosophy for descriptive truth, prescriptive goodness, and beauty. The Philosophical Triads are an important addition to integrative enneagram theory.8

It is surprising that Mark's most used enneagram triad is Descriptive Truth (+11) with a Ne-Te- Se function order. This is slightly higher than the 2-3-4 Feeling Triad (+9) or the 4-5-9 Withdrawn Triad (+8). Notice also that the 4-1-7 function order for the Truth triad is the theoretical order for the direction of integration according to the Law of Seven (4-2-8-5-7-1). It is not necessary for any individual to fit a theory. But it is significant when an exemplar's behavior has a theoretical interpretation. Then the exemplar and the enneagram professional can explore the possible meaning. Point Four's movement to Point One with the 4-1 arrow is the theoretical direction of integration to increase Truth, compared to moving towards Point Two with the 4-2 arrow to increase Feeling Values. Mark confirmed that this has been his development direction over the years. This is reflected in the slightly higher score for Point One over Point Two in the 1-2-6 Compliant Triad.

Using different triads to search for the highest pattern is analogous to panning for gold with a mesh designed for different sized gold nuggets. All enneagram points are significant, and all RHETI data is significant because the instrument was designed for a median score of 16 in the range between 0 and 32. If all points were used equally, then each point would have a RHETI score on the median. Typically a person uses one point more than other points.

2.4 Calculating the Jungian Bipolar Triad Traits With RHETI Scores

Jungian Bipolar Triad Traits
RHETI 4-8-6 2-9-7 3-5-1
Type Above 16 ENFP ENFJ EMTP
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -2
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Triad Score +2 -6 +4
Triad Rank second third first
Function Order Ne-Fi-Si Fe-Se-Ni Me-Ti-Te

The 4-8-6, 2-9-7, and 3-5-1 Triads are significant new patterns of information that can be interpreted on the Enneagram of Consciousness. The author showed that these three triads, the Ichazo triads, the Hornevian triads, and another set of Jungian triads (that contain a pause represented by Point Zero) are all part of one holistic family tree. The tree is defined by fractal theory and prescribed by the Enneagram Law of Thirty-Seven for whole events. 9

The 36 points specified on the enneagram circle circumference by the Law of Thirty-Seven are like 36 energy patterns for 36 triadic sub-events that might be present in one enneagram cycle. They are archetypal footprints for modes of energy. Fortunately, RHETI continuous scores allow the potential score for each energy pattern to be calculated. Although the triads are nuggets found in panning for gold, they must be discussed with the individual to see if they are significant, and if theory predicts the same meaning for them as the individual who reported the data. This is the necessary approach for any scientific method in any field of endeavor.

Panning for gold with these triads turned up a surprising nugget that is unaccounted for by MBTI type and Keirsey temperament theory. The Triad 3-5-1 has the formal properties of an Ideo-motive function. The 3-5-1 triad pattern has the highest score (+4) and is defined as EMTP on the Enneagram of Consciousness. Notice that MBTI cannot distinguish between M (moving) and N (intuition) because it is not designed for a five function model. Intuition uses the language of possibilities, but extraverted moving makes the possibilities that intuition perceives in the world. This means that the EMTP triad would likely be reported as ENTP with both MBTI and David Keirsey's Temperament system. 10 The function pairs ESTP, ENTP, and EMTP have intrinsic ambiguity because S and N perceptions are both conditioned by the M moving function.

The 1-3-5 triad is correlated with ideas that can be translated into actions via the psychomotor or the moving function. William James called this ideo-motor action. 11 Language is a form of "idea in motion". Words, or Logos at Point One are sounded silently in mind, just moments before they are transformed into spoken words by the learned moving function and heard by other people.

The EMTP pattern is due to the moving function that is included by Five Function theory 12 13 on the Enneagram of Consciousness. Jungian information triads include the moving function because fractal geometry predicts how whole events are formed from the nine enneagram functions during time intervals. The moving function is compatible with Jungian psychology. Jung focused his attention on a pure psychological functions used by a person's mind before they decide to use their moving functions. The actual work to "jump across the stream" is carried out by psychomotor or moving functions. The artist moves to arrange lighting and position the photographic subject for a better image. New new psychological information from the perception and judgment functions comes after changes made by moving functions. The new psychological information may then lead to new action by moving functions. The artist uses several moving functions: feet to walk, hands to rearrange the composition, voice to talk, and fingers to click the camera shutter. The end product is the elusive "intentional" photograph that captures the sought after image.

Movement on the Process Enneagram of Consciousness Information is received at the Point Three "shock point". This new information enters the input cycle at the bottom "P" side of the Enneagram of Consciousness" and continues to Point Seven - the last point on the "P" side. Then information flows towards the top ‘J" side of the enneagram beginning with Point Eight and continues around the top "J" side of the enneagram, and stops at Point Three to complete the output cycle. We use the notation Me.p and Me.j to denote these two sides of the Enneagram of Consciousness. Me.p is oriented to process, with seeing and listening to get more information. Me.j is oriented to product, with speaking, writing, deciding, and commanding to complete the current task, to move the product to completion, and to close off the process. Naturally, a person must use both sides for social adaption and orientation in the real world, even though they usually prefer to use one side, if they are free to choose for themselves. Eight MBTI "P" types are defined on the "P" side, eight MBTI "J" types are defined on the "J" side of the Enneagram of Consciousness. These 16 True MBTI types have opposite attitudes for dominant and auxiliary functions. There are 16 matching Pseudo Types that have the same attitude for both pair of Jungian functions and they include enneagram arrows.

2.5 Calculating the Jungian Center of Consciousness Triads With RHETI Scores

Jungian Center of Consciousness Triads
RHETI 1-0-8 2-7-0 4-5-0
Type Above 16 EST ESF ENT
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3
Triad Score -4 -3 +11
Triad Rank third second first
Function Order Te-Co-Si Fe-Se-Co Ne-Ti-Co

Notice that Point Zero is at the center of the Enneagram Circle of Consciousness, but no scores are available because no questions were asked for that centered state of being (heart, soul, body, and mind). Notice that the 4-5-0 Triad is tied for first place with the 4-1-7 triad for Descriptive Truth (if we assume that point zero would have a median score if it were tested). The MBTI Form M shows the artist's preference for introspection (introversion), and intuition, or introverted intuition (Ni-9). Dialog with the artist discloses that the pause for the right photographic moment is an occurrence of centered awareness in pure objective consciousness. In this state, the inner consciousness (Co) at Point Zero is in harmony with outer consciousness of the world.

The 4-5-0 triad and the 4-5-9 withdrawn or contemplative triad are related. Point Zero is the state of being fully present and conscious. Indeed one contributor (Tal) at the EMBTI Community Forum made a persuasive argument that Point Nine was really Point Zero at the center of the Enneagram of Consciousness. We discussed this concept extensively by email. Point Zero is a state of being aligned in consciousness, but not identified with functions of consciousness or objects of consciousness. The artist Mark is motivated by the image which is presented by the Ni function of consciousness. Paradoxically this image arises freely - out of the practice of centering and pausing - when the Point Zero state of being in full consciousness is experienced naturally. The parallelism between 4-5-0 and 4-5-9 illustrates why there might be confusion in discerning the difference between the function of consciousness Ni at Point Nine (that can be free or fixated), and the center of consciousness Co (that must be present to makes a distinction between the Observer and that which is Observed. It is not possible to construct: 1) a circle without a radius and a center point, 2) a wheel without spokes and a center hub, or 3) an enneagram wheel without functions of consciousness for spokes, and a center point for the hub that is consciousness itself.

The centered Point Zero for whole unitary consciousness is missing when identification occurs with any of the nine fundamental enneagram points, according to Fourth Way teachings, such as taught by Ouspensky. 14 This is how Jungian Psychological Type and Enneagram Personality Type is created. Type is an error in observation that is made by an observer who is not centered, but instead is identified with the object. A quick fix in practice is the continual mental reminder that the Observer cannot be that which is Observed. This is the other side of the philosophical error that claims, in error, that real objects cannot be known. Mortimer Adler reports that several modern philosophers fall into this mental trap. 15 These observers have identified with a wrong idea - they confuse that object which we know, move towards, and apprehend with - that information by which we know that real object. Because moving function is omitted in the discussion, the uncertainty of that by which we know - is used to deny the real existence of that which we apprehend directly as a real object. This is a repeat of Zeno's Paradox of Achilles being unable to overcome the tortoise in a race.

Triadic inclusive logic, often referred to as Hegel's dialectical method, is the solution for empty dualistic either-or logic with hidden false propositions. This is the fundamental reason that the enneagram method is so effective in describing real people, places, and things.

Section Three: Calculating Jungian and MBTI Parameters from RHETI Data
skip to
conclusion

Many meaningful enneagram triad patterns of information were calculated in Part 2, and interpreted with Jungian psychology. Jungian triads have been a relatively unexplored area in the past, because there was no theoretical framework to hold that concept in mind until enneagram theory was developed. Jungian patterns are considered in Part 3 that are independent of enneagram triads. Many of these Jungian patterns are dyads. The author considers enneagram triads and Jungian triads to be more fundamental than Jungian sets of two functions (dyads) or sets of four functions (quads). According to Von Franz, Jung said that only three Jungian function could ever present together on the top field of ego consciousness. 16 This triadic Jungian formula is supported by the triadic Enneagram Law of Thirty-Seven fractal patterns.

3.1 Jungian Psychological S, T, N, F Functions 1718

Jungian Psychological S,T,N,F Functions
RHETI Intuition Sensation Thinking Feeling
Type Above 16 4-9 7-8 1-5 2-6
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Dyad Score +7 -9 +4 -2
Triad Rank first third second third

The rank order for the Jungian functions of consciousness is N-T-F-S with RHETI scores. Mark's preference for intuition is very clear; the intuition dyad score is 16 units higher than the sensation dyad. MBTI Form M also reported Mark's preference for intuition over sensation. The scores for the rational thinking functions (+4) are slightly higher than the scores for the rational feeling functions (-2). MBTI predicts a Jungian function order N-F-T-S, and the RHETI shows Mark's current preferences. Mark has an NF temperament and the higher RHETI score for rational thinking than rational feeling merely reflects development of his thinking function with the 4-1 arrow in the direction of integration with Point Four (+10) and Point One (+3). The 4-1 arrow supports the 4-1-7 Descriptive Truth Triad that is essential for a truthful photographic image.

The purpose of Point Seven is to provide energy for the factual Se-Ni dyad that carries the hidden image (Ni). If the artist is not careful at Point Four, then the Ne-Si dyad's automatic Si subjective feelings raised by the desirable beauty of the object will mask recognition of the intrinsic Ni objective admirable beauty of the object in the real world. Moving onward to Point Seven solves this problem because now the Se-Ni bipolar dyad and the Se-Ne unipolar dyad are both active. Factual reality is now in the foreground at Point Seven, and intuition is now in a preconscious role to rise and meet sensations from the real object in the world.

3.2 Predicting Jungian Psychological E/I Attitudes

Jungian Psychological E/I Attitudes
Extraverted Introverted Intentional
RHETI real object subjective object intentional object
Type Above 16 1-2-4-7 5-6-8-9 3
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Quad Score +10 -10 0

The question is: "Should Mark's Persona score be counted as an extraverted or introverted activity?" The answer is: "It depends if Mark does more talking or listening". His empathic listening and careful photo composition work could be counted as introverted activity by the E-I scale questions, but it is also an example of quiet extraverted behavior.

The next question is: "Should an artist's well developed extraverted intuition be counted as an extraverted or introverted Enneagram type, if Four's bipolar opposite Si actually contributes to some of the RHETI score?" The answer is "We should count Four's score as a "quiet" extraverted intuition function that perceives and recognizes meaning in the external object of attention, while "feeling" an affect or feeling tone from the heart's response to the external object." This is the nature of the 2-3-4 Heart or Feeling Triad. Of course, if Four places attention on an internal instead of an external object, then their attention attitude would be counted as introverted. Point Four's quiet extraversion is supported by the extraverted arrows ( 4-1 and 4-2) to Points One and Two. David Keirsey claims that the E-I preference scale is actually a measure of an expressive versus reserved attitude. MBTI Form M reported that Mark had a very clear preference for the introverted or reserved "I" attitude. This is consistent with Mark's quiet professional nature, his quiet extraverted intuition in the feeling triad, and his quiet extraverted and introverted intuition in the Withdrawn or Contemplative triad. A superior well differentiated intuition function is not loud.

Point Three is not one of the four Jungian functions of consciousness. It performs the psychological function of Jungian Persona, and is the point from which voice is sounded through the Persona mask. Mortimer Adler identified the triad of necessary philosophical objects: real, subjective, and intentional. Real objects exist in the world independent of mind, subjective objects exist in the body and mind, and intentional objects are a synthesis of real and subjective object types. Human language and symbol is an intentional object type. Point Three, called The Achiever by Riso, accounts for the human faculty for creating the specifically human intentional object type, and creating human language based civilizations. This is accomplished by the Achiever's ability to motivate others to work together for common purposes.

3.3 Predicting Jungian Psychological Unipolar Jungian Functions

Unipolar Jungian Functions
Je Ji Pe Pi
RHETI Te-Fe Ti-Fi Ne-Se Ni-Si
Above 16 1-2 5-6 4-7 9-8
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Triad Score +2 0 +8 -10

Notice that the Jungian 4-7 unipolar dyad score is +8 above the median and the 4-7 line is contained in the 1-4-7 Descriptive Truth triad. Note also that the Jungian 1-2 unipolar dyad score is +2 above the median. Previous EMBTI articles found that the Jungian unipolar functions were foundational factors to explain enneagram type dynamics. This is confirmed once more with the 1-4-7 triad which is composed from an extraverted unipolar perception pair (4-7) and extraverted thinking from Point Four's direction of integration to Point One (4-1 arrow).

Notice that the combined score for the rational Jungian judging functions (Je plus Ji) is +2 above the median, but the combined score for the irrational Jungian perception functions (Pe plus Pi) is -2 below the median. This is consistent with Mark's MBTI "J" preference in dealing with the world, and his "N" preference for insight and meaning from his inner world. We should note that the MBTI J or P preference scale involves the moving function (although it is not explicitly stated).

The J or P preference scale is not the Jungian Judgment or Perception dyad, although this misunderstanding can result because the name for the J-P orientation in the world is the same name as the Jungian J/P dyad. The Enneagram of Consciousness views the moving function as the fundamental mechanism for adapting and orienting to the world that is seen in a person's behavior and Persona. The moving function has either a "J" (Me.j) product, or a "P" (Me.p) process orientation. This is the interpretation for the MBTI J-P Preference Dyad on the Enneagram of Consciousness.

3.4 Predicting Jungian Psychological Bipolar Jungian Functions

Bipolar Jungian Functions
RHETI Te-Fi Ti-Fe Ne-Si Ni-Se
Above 16 1-6 5-2 4-8 9-7
One: Te +3 +3
Two: Fe -1 -1
Three: Me 0
Four: Ne +10 +10
Five: Ti +1 +1
Six: Fi -1 -1
Seven: Se -2 -2
Eight: Si -7 -7
Nine: Ni -3 -3
Quad Score +2 0 +3 -5

Notice that the highest bipolar perception score (+3) for Ne-Si is not as significant as the highest unipolar perception score (+8) for Ne-Se. Previous EMBTI articles also reported that unipolar function pairs were more fundamental than bipolar function pairs. The dominant bipolar scores in the above table are for Ne-Si Jungian perception dyads and Te-Fi Jungian judgment dyads. This pair of bipolar dyads forms the ENFP type with the Ne-Fi-Te-Si sequence. The other pair of bipolar dyads forms the INFJ type with the Ni-Fe-Ti-Se sequence. The MBTI Form M indicated an INFJ type for Mark. The Enneagram of Consciousness affirms that the NF temperament process is composed of a sequence of the five Enneagram Points 3-4-6-9-2-3. Points 3-4-6 are on the P side and 9-2-3 are on the J side. But a J-P synthesis is accomplished by 6-9 between P and J, and 2-4 between J and P.

Section Four: Conclusion
skip to
footnotes

The Jungian and enneagram traits for an artist have been studied to illustrate the significance of triads of information on the Enneagram of Consciousness. There is reason to believe that Jungian and MBTI type dynamics can benefit by looking at archetypal triads that are examples of Jungian non-causal synchronicity. These synchronistic patterns are made visible by the Enneagram of Consciousness, fractal geometry, and a commitment to seeing events in the world as being intrinsically whole - not partitioned. The Enneagram of Consciousness is an integrative theory that recognize the wholeness of human nature with Jung's insightful language of consciousness.

The following patterns were found to be significant, and are arranged in order of their calculated order of priority. Notice that extraverted intuition is the first function in the five triads, and moving function is the first function in two triads. Mark has an Enneagram Type Four, but uses several integrative behavioral patterns to support his artistic priorities and produce faithful photographic images for his clients.

Order  Triad  Triad Name    Discovered       Score         Function
                            By               Above         Order
                                             Median
 
1.     4-1-7  Truth         Geldart          +11           Ne-Te-Se
2.     4-5-0  Centered ENT  Geldart          +11           Ne-Ti-Co
3.     4-3-2  Feeling       Ichazo            +9           Ne-Me-Fe
4.     4-5-9  Withdrawn     Riso              +8           Ne-Ti-Ni
5.     3-5-1  EMTP          Geldart           +4           Me-Ti-Te
6.     3-6-9  Beauty        Geldart           +4           Me-Fi-Ni
7.     4-6-8  ENFP          Geldart           +2           Ne-Fi-Si
8.     1-2-6  Compliant     Riso              +1           Te-Fe-Fi

Progress was made to understand enneagram freedom and fixations when Jungian theory was extended with the fifth moving function and an enneagram process model. The nine superior conscious psychological functions on the Geldart Enneagram of Consciousness account for the observed behaviors, and allow a more holistic Enneagram Center theory than provided by the common three functions/three Centers model.

This article shows that accurate type indicators are needed so an individual 's enneagram type behavior and motivations can be studied qualitatively and quantitatively. Large scale MBTI and Enneagram Personality type statistical surveys and analysis, such as those reported at the Enneagram and the MBTI, are quite necessary to confirm theory or establish correlations. However, the individual is the living document and final authority on whether a theory describes them. There is much to be gained by analyzing both the RHETI and MBTI scores for an individual, and listening to them tell their own story. Improvements to theory begin by listening to an individual carefully. To underline this, I quote Katherine Downing Myers (co-owner of the MBTI): "My conclusions from my own experience, as well as these "conversations with Isabel" is that we need to approach type development with the same value system we use in helping people learn about their psychological preferences: with respect for the individual and for differences." 19


Footnotes and References

1. Walter J. Geldart, The Enneagram of Consciousness and Jungian Psychology, Full Circle, The Enneagram Institute, Fall 1997, page 4-5, and 12-13. [available at EMBTI] back to text

2. The Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator, Version 2.5, The Enneagram Institute, 1998, 18 pages. back to text

3. Isabel Briggs Myers, Mary H. McCaully, Naomi L. Quenk, Allen L. Hammer, MBTI Manual, A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Third Edition, 1998, 419 pages. back to text

4. Don Richard Riso with Russ Hudson, Personality Types - Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery, Houghton Mifflin, 1996, 514 pages. back to text

5. Riso and Hudson, Personality Types, Houghton Mifflin, 1996, pages 27-55, 432-443. back to text

6. Katherine Myers, Isabel Briggs Myers and Type Development, Bulletin of Psychological Type, Volume 16, Number 4, Fall 1993, pages 6-8. back to text

7. Isabel Briggs Myers, .., MBTI Manual, A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Third Edition, 1998, page 230. back to text

8. Walter Geldart, The Enneagram of Equilateral Triangles, Full Circle, The Enneagram Institute, Summer 1998, page 4-5,9. back to text

9. Walter J. Geldart, Enneagram Triads on the Enneagram of Consciousness, Full Circle, The Enneagram Institute, Spring 1998, page 4-5, 12-13. back to text

10. David Keirsey, Please Understand Me II, Temperament Character, Intelligence, Prometheus Nemesis Books, 1998, pages 12-16, pages 331-336. back to text

11. Roberto AssagioThe Act of Will, Arkana Books, 1992, page 51.back to text

12. John Fudjack, Geldart's Fifth Function - an ingenious strategy for reconciling the Enneagram and the MBTI, EMBTI, Issue 1 back to text

13. Walter Geldart, Why the Enneagram of Consciousness? EMBTI, Issue 2 back to text

14. P. D. Ouspensky, In Search of the Miraculous, Harcourt Brace, 1949. back to text

15. Mortimer J. Adler, Ten Philosophical Mistakes - a provocative look at the errors of modern thought by America's "Philosopher for Everyman", Collier Books, 1985. back to text

16.Marie-Louise Von Franz, Psychotherapy, Shambhala, 1993, page 53. back to text

17. Von Franz, Psychotheraphy, Shambhala, 1993. back to text

18. Daryl Sharp, Personality Types, Inner City Books, 1987. back to text

19. Katherine Myers, Isabel Briggs Myers and Type Development, Bulletin of Psychological Type, Volume 16, Number 4, Fall 1993, page 8. back to text

Beginning of This Paper

Back to Front Page